[1]闫富有,崔昊,李俊超,等.考虑胶结退化的水泥土边界面模型及参数研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2021,42(01):63-69.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2021.01.010]
　YAN Fuyou,CUI Hao,LI Junchao,et al.Bounding Surface Model and Parameters Study on Describing the Behavior of Cement-treated Clay with Cementation Degradation[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2021,42(01):63-69.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2021.01.010]
点击复制

考虑胶结退化的水泥土边界面模型及参数研究()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
42
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
63-69
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-03-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Bounding Surface Model and Parameters Study on Describing the Behavior of Cement-treated Clay with Cementation Degradation
作者:
闫富有; 崔昊; 李俊超; 郜新军
1.郑州大学 土木工程学院，河南 郑州 450001； 2.重庆大学 土木工程学院，重庆 400044
Author(s):
YAN Fuyou1;  CUI Hao2;  LI Junchao1;  GAO Xinjun1
1.School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 2.School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
关键词:
水泥固化土; 胶结退化; 边界面模型; 参数估计
Keywords:
cement-treated clay;  cementation degradation;  bounding surface model;  parametric estimation
分类号:
TU43
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2021.01.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于修正平均有效应力的方法，对水泥固化土的胶结作用和剪切过程的胶结退化现象进行描述。除少部分参数需要借助于其他绘图软件外，多数均可通过程序计算拟合。在此基础上，建立考虑胶结作用和胶结退化现象的水泥固化土双面边界面本构模型，模型基本参数采用最小二乘法，由固结不排水剪试验结果的偏应力-偏应变曲线拟合得到。通过对不同种类、不同水泥掺量的水泥固化土，在不同围压下固结不排水剪试验的模拟与试验结果比较，显示出所建模型和参数拟合方法的可靠性与正确性。最后，为了进一步说明本文模型与方法的作用，给出了循环荷载作用下固结不排水剪试验的模拟算例，表明数值结果可揭示循环荷载作用下水泥固化土的应力、超孔隙水压力及应力路径等主要应力-应变特征。
Abstract:
Based on the concept of modified mean effective stress, the effect of cementitious bonding and the loss of bonding during loading for cement-treated clay were described, in which most of the parameters could be got automatically by program calculation except for a few parameters estimated by other software. And then, the bounding surface model with two surfaces was developed in order to describe the behaviour of cementation and cementation degradation of cement-treated clay, and the basic model parameters were selected in the deviator strain and deviator stress plane from undrained shear tests. The reliability and correctness of the proposed constitutive model and their parametric estimation methods were shown by comparing the simulation and test results of the undrained shear tests from the literature under different confining pressure for different kinds and different cement contents cement-treated clay. Finally, to further illustrate the advantages of the proposed model, a numerical example was conducted on triaxial undrained shear test under cyclic loading condition for cement-treated clay, and the results showed that it could reveal the main stress-strain characteristics of cement-treated clay such as stress, excess pore water pressure and stress path and so on under cyclic loading condition.

参考文献/References:

[1] HORPIBULSUK S, MIURA N, BERGADO D T. Undrained shear behavior of cement admixed clay at high water content[J]. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2004,130(10): 1096-1105.

[2] ABU-FARSAKH M, DHAKAL S, CHEN Q M. Laboratory characterization of cementitiously treated/stabilized very weak subgrade soil under cyclic loading[J]. Soils and foundations, 2015, 55(3): 504-516.
[3] SASANIAN S, NEWSON T A. Basic parameters governing the behaviour of cement-treated clays[J]. Soils and foundations, 2014,54(2):209-224.
[4] SUEBSUK J, HORPIBULSUK S, LIU M D. Modified structured cam clay: a generalised critical state model for destructured, naturally structured and artificially structured clays[J]. Computers and geotechnics, 2010, 37(7/8): 956-968.
[5] KASAMA K, OCHIAI H, YASUFUKU N. On the stress-strain behaviour of lightly cemented clay based on an extended critical state concept[J]. Soils and foundations, 2000,40(5): 37-47.
[6] NGUYEN L D,FATAHI B,KHABBAZ H. A constitutive model for cemented clays capturing cementation degradation[J]. International journal of plasticity，2014, 56: 1-18.
[7] ARROYO M, CIANTIA M, CASTELLANZA R, et al. Simulation of cement-improved clay structures with a bonded elasto-plastic model: a practical approach[J]. Computers and geotechnics, 2012,45: 140-150.
[8] NGUYEN L, FATAHI B, KHABBAZ H. Development of a constitutive model to predict the behavior of cement-treated clay during cementation degradation: C3 model[J]. International journal of geomechanics, 2017,17(7): 04017010.
[9] YAPAGE N N S, LIYANAPATHIRANA D S, POULOS H G, et al. Numerical modeling of geotextile-reinforced embankments over deep cement mixed columns incorporating strain-softening behavior of columns[J]. International journal of geomechanics, 2015, 15 (2):04014047.
[10] RAHIMI M, CHAN D, NOURI A. Bounding surface constitutive model for cemented sand under monotonic loading[J]. International journal of geomechanics, 2016,16(2): 04015049.
[11] IMAM S M R, MORGENSTERN N R, ROBERTSON P K, et al. A critical-state constitutive model for liquefiable sand[J]. Canadian geotechnical journal, 2005, 42(3): 830-855.
[12] XIAO H W, LEE F H, LIU Y. Bounding surface cam-clay model with cohesion for cement-admixed clay[J]. International journal of geomechanics, 2017,17(1): 04016026.
[13] QUIROGA A J, THOMPSON Z M, MURALEETHARAN K K, et al. Stress-strain behavior of cement-improved clays: testing and modeling[J]. Acta geotechnica, 2017, 12(5): 1003-1020.
[14] RAHIMI M, CHAN D, NOURI A. Constitutive model for monotonic and cyclic responses of loosely cemented sand formations[J]. Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering, 2018, 10(4): 740-752.
[15] RUSSELL A R, KHALILI N. A bounding surface plasticity model for sands exhibiting particle crushing[J]. Canadian geotechnical journal, 2004, 41(6): 1179-1192.
[16] RUSSELL A R, KHALILI N. A unified bounding surface plasticity model for unsaturated soils[J]. International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, 2006, 30(3): 181-212.
[17] KAN M E, TAIEBAT H A, KHALILI N. Simplified mapping rule for bounding surface simulation of complex loading paths in granular materials[J]. International journal of geomechanics, 2014, 14(2): 239-253.
[18] SLOAN S W, ABBO A J, SHENG D C. Refined explicit integration of elastoplastic models with automatic error control[J]. Engineering computations, 2001,18(1/2): 121-129.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-15