[1]孙 超,李世杰,张 鹏,等.出行系统最优配置下共享停车选择及泊位分配[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2023,44(01):38-43.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2023.01.011]
 SUN Chao,LI Shijie,ZHANG Peng,et al.Shared Parking Selection and Berth Allocation for Optimal Configuration of Travel System[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2023,44(01):38-43.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2023.01.011]
点击复制

出行系统最优配置下共享停车选择及泊位分配()
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
44
期数:
2023年01期
页码:
38-43
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-12-06

文章信息/Info

Title:
Shared Parking Selection and Berth Allocation for Optimal Configuration of Travel System
作者:
孙 超 李世杰 张 鹏 尹浩为 蔡宇航
江苏大学汽车与交通工程学院,江苏镇江 212013

Author(s):
SUN Chao LI Shijie ZHANG Peng YIN Haowei CAI Yuhang
School of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
关键词:
Keywords:
urban transportation shared parking parking balance integer programming berth allocation
分类号:
U491
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2023.01.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为提升城市出行及停车供需匹配的效率,提出了一种面向出行系统最优配置的停车选择及泊位分配整合 模型。构建考虑共享停车用户出行费用和非共享停车用户出行费用的停车选择均衡模型,并设计下降算法求解停 车选择均衡模型;对共享停车用户,建立共享停车平台运营商、泊位供给者和泊位需求者综合泊位分配整数规划模 型,出行选择模型与泊位分配模型之间通过共享停车泊位分配决策变量建立联系。算例分析结果表明,提出的泊 位分配模型对用户预约请求接受率达到83%,且模型能够高效应用于实际停车问题;出行用户更倾向于选择行驶 距离和步行距离近的停车场,共享停车与非共享停车流量增速差距最大的停车请求规模既可以使运营商获得较高 利润,又能够提高共享停车与非共享停车流量之间的平衡性。
Abstract:
In order to improve the efficiency of urban travel and parking supply-demand matching, an integrated model of parking mode selection and berth allocation for optimal configuration of travel system was explored. Firstly, a parking choice equilibrium model considering the travel cost of shared parking users and non-shared parking users was constructed. A descent algorithm was designed to solve the parking choice equilibrium model. Secondly, for shared parking users, the integrated berth allocation integer programming model of shared parking platform operators, berth suppliers and berth demanders was established. The travel choice model and the berth allocation model were linked through the decision variables of shared parking allocation. The example showed that the reception rate of the proposed berth allocation model to the user reservation request reached 83%, and the model could be effectively applied to the actual parking problem. Travel users prefered to choose parking lots with short driving distance and walking distance. When the growth gap between shared parking and non-shared parking traffic was the largest, the scale of parking requests could not only enable operators to obtain higher profits, but also improve the balance between shared parking and non-shared parking traffic.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张雪妍, 贺锋. 基于累积前景理论的组合出行交通分 配模型[ J] . 郑州大学学报( 工学版) , 2020, 41( 3) : 91-96. 

ZHANG X Y, HE F. Traffic assignment model with combined modes based on cumulative prospect theory [ J ] . Journal of Zhengzhou university ( engineering science) , 第 1 期 孙超,等:出行系统最优配置下共享停车选择及泊位分配 43 2020, 41(3) : 91-96. 
[2] HASSINE S B, MRAIHI R, LACHIHEB A, et al. Modelling parking type choice behavior[EB / OL] . (2021-09 -22) [2022-03- 20] . https: / / www. sciencedirect. com / science / article / pii / S2046043021000721.
[3] WANG A G, GUAN H Z, QIN Z T, et al. Study on the intention of private parking space owners of different levels of cities to participate in shared parking in China[J]. Discrete dynamics in nature and society, 2021, 2021: 1-16.
[4] 田丽君, 杨茜, 黄海军, 等. 基于累积前景理论的出 行方式选择模型及实证[ J] . 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(7) : 1778-1785. 
TIAN L J, YANG Q, HUANG H J, et al. The cumulative prospect theory-based travel mode choice model and its empirical verification[ J] . Systems engineering-theory & practice, 2016, 36(7) : 1778-1785. 
[5] FANG S S, YAO X S, ZHANG J Q, et al. Grey correlation analysis on travel modes and their influence factors [ J] . Procedia engineering, 2017, 174: 347-352. 
[6] SHAO C Y, YANG H, ZHANG Y, et al. A simple reservation and allocation model of shared parking lots[ J] . Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 2016, 71: 303-312.
[7] JIANG B W, FAN Z P. Optimal allocation of shared parking slots considering parking unpunctuality under a platform-based management approach[ J] . Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 2020, 142: 102062. 
[8] WANG S F, LI Z H, XIE N. A reservation and allocation model for shared-parking addressing the uncertainty in drivers′ arrival / departure time [ J ]. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 2022, 135: 103484.
[9] 张水潮, 蔡逸飞, 黄锐, 等. 基于预约需求的共享停 车平台泊位分配方法[ J] . 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3) : 137-143, 162. 
ZHANG S C, CAI Y F, HUANG R, et al. Shared parking space allocation method considering reservation demand [J]. Journal of transportation systems engineering and information technology, 2020, 20(3): 137-143, 162. 
[10] 姚恩建, 张正超, 张嘉霖, 等. 居住区共享泊位资源 优化配置模型及算法[ J] . 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(2) : 160-167. 
YAO E J, ZHANG Z C, ZHANG J L, et al. A model and algorithm for optimization of the utilization of residential shared parking slots[ J] . Journal of transportation systems engineering and information technology, 2017, 17 (2) : 160-167. 
[11] LAI M H, CAI X Q, HU Q. Market design for commutedriven private parking lot sharing [ J ]. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 2021, 124: 102915.
[12] 胥晶晶. 考虑泊位共享的居住区停车预约分配模型研 究[D] . 西安: 长安大学, 2019. 
XU J J. Study on parking reservation allocation model in residential area of considering berth sharing[ D] . Xi′an: Chang′an University, 2019. 
[13] 段满珍, 杨兆升, 张林, 等. 个性化诱导下的居住区 共享停车泊位分配模型[ J] . 东北大学学报( 自然科 学版) , 2017, 38(2) : 174-179. 
DUAN M Z, YANG Z S, ZHANG L, et al. Parking spaces allocation model of residential areas sharing parking based on personalized guidance [ J]. Journal of northeastern university (natural science), 2017, 38(2): 174-179

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-07