[1]马红芳,陈秀锋..好氧式MBR与间歇式MBR脱氮性能的对比试验研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2008,29(01):102-105.
 MA Hongfang,Chen Xiufeng.Comparative experimental study on nitrogen removal performance of aerobic MBR and batch MBR[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2008,29(01):102-105.
点击复制

好氧式MBR与间歇式MBR脱氮性能的对比试验研究()
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
29
期数:
2008年01期
页码:
102-105
栏目:
出版日期:
1900-01-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative experimental study on nitrogen removal performance of aerobic MBR and batch MBR
作者:
马红芳陈秀锋.
华侨大学,土木工程学院,福建,泉州,362021, 华侨大学,土木工程学院,福建,泉州,362021
Author(s):
MA Hongfang; Chen Xiufeng
关键词:
生活污水 好氧式膜生物反应器 间歇式膜生物反应器 脱氮
Keywords:
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
试验比较了好氧式膜生物反应器(MBR)与间歇式膜生物反应器处理生活污水时的脱氮效果.结果表明,在进水COD值、氮负荷和COD/TN值出现较大变化时,间歇式MBR可以通过灵活改变操作条件获得较高的脱氮效果,表现出良好的抗冲击负荷能力.在TN去除方面,间歇式MBR明显优于好氧式MBR,二者平均去除率分别为63.9%和15.34%;在NH3-N去除方面,间歇式MBR平均去除率为87.4%,而好氧式MBR则需要通过外加碱性物质,才能获得较高的去除效果,平均去除率为78.7%.
Abstract:
The nitrogen removal effect of aerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR) and batch membrane bioreactor in the treatment of domestic wastewater was compared. The results show that when the COD value, nitrogen load and COD/TN value of the influent water change greatly, the batch MBR can obtain a high nitrogen removal effect by flexibly changing the operating conditions, and show good shock load resistance. In terms of TN removal, batch MBR was significantly better than aerobic MBR, with average removal rates of 63.9% and 15.34%, respectively. In terms of NH3-N removal, the average removal rate of batch MBR was 87.4%, while aerobic MBR required the addition of alkaline substances to obtain a high removal effect, with an average removal rate of 78.7%.

相似文献/References:

[1]蒋利伟,燕启社,黄飞,等.土壤生态系统处理生活污水的应用研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2012,33(01):79.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2012.01.020]
 WU Mingjian,ZHANG Yan,ZHANG Haiyan,et al.Application of Soll Infiltration System for Domestie Sewage[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2012,33(01):79.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2012.01.020]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01